Google Settles Data Privacy Lawsuit with Texas for $1.4B

Google agrees to a $1.4 billion settlement over allegations of unauthorized data collection practices in Texas.

Science & Environment Reporter

Science & Environment Reporter

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Alphabet Inc.’s Google has agreed to pay $1.4 billion to resolve a landmark data privacy lawsuit filed by the state of Texas, marking one of the largest tech-related settlements in U.S. history. The lawsuit, initiated in 2020, accused Google of systematically harvesting sensitive user data without consent, violating state and federal privacy laws. The resolution underscores escalating regulatory scrutiny of Big Tech’s data practices and sets a precedent for state-led enforcement in the absence of comprehensive federal privacy legislation.

Background: The Allegations and Legal Battle

  1. Core Claims:

    • Covert Location Tracking: Texas alleged Google deceived users by continuing to collect location data even when location history settings were disabled. Internal documents revealed engineers referred to this practice as “positional dark patterns.”

    • Unauthorized Biometric Data Collection: Google Photos allegedly scanned and stored facial recognition data from millions of Texans without explicit consent, violating the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI).

    • Targeting Minors: The suit claimed YouTube (owned by Google) collected data on users under 13 without parental consent, breaching the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).

  2. Legal Framework:

    • Texas invoked its Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) and federal statutes, arguing Google’s practices constituted “unlawful monopolistic behavior” by leveraging data dominance to stifle competition.

  3. Litigation Timeline:

    • 2020: Texas AG Ken Paxton filed the suit alongside 10 other states.

    • 2022: A Travis County judge denied Google’s motion to dismiss, allowing discovery to proceed.

    • 2023: Leaked internal emails revealed executives discussing efforts to “obfuscate” data collection practices from regulators.

Settlement Terms: Beyond the $1.4 Billion Fine

  1. Financial Penalties:

    • $1.2 billion: Paid to Texas’ general revenue fund, the largest single-state privacy settlement ever.

    • **200million∗∗:Allocatedtoestablisha“DataPrivacyRestitutionFund”foraffectedTexans,offeringupto200million∗∗:Allocatedtoestablisha“DataPrivacyRestitutionFund”foraffectedTexans,offeringupto200 per user for those who file claims.

  2. Operational Reforms:

    • Transparency Mandates: Google must provide “clear, granular opt-out options” for location and biometric data collection, with annual third-party audits until 2030.

    • Youth Data Protections: YouTube will implement age-verification systems and disable personalized ads for users under 18.

    • Algorithm Disclosure: Requires Google to disclose how search and ad algorithms prioritize content, addressing antitrust concerns.

  3. Compliance Monitoring:

    • A court-appointed watchdog will oversee reforms for five years, with penalties up to $500 million for non-compliance.

Political and Industry Reactions

  1. Texas AG Ken Paxton:

    • “This settlement is a wake-up call: Texas will not tolerate Silicon Valley’s surveillance capitalism. If you exploit Texans’ data, you will pay.”

  2. Google’s Statement:

    • While denying wrongdoing, Google stated, “We’re pleased to resolve this matter and build on reforms we’ve already implemented.” The company cited its 2022 launch of auto-delete controls for location history.

  3. Tech Advocacy Groups:

    • The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) praised the restitution fund but criticized the lack of injunctive relief for non-Texans.

    • TechNet, a lobbying group, warned the settlement could “stifle innovation” by incentivizing frivolous state lawsuits.

Broader Implications

  1. State vs. Federal Enforcement:

    • With Congress deadlocked on federal privacy laws, states like Texas and California are filling the void. California’s CPRA and Virginia’s CDPA now face pressure to adopt similar aggressive measures.

  2. Precedent for Meta and Amazon:

    • Texas is pursuing parallel suits against Meta for Instagram’s impact on teen mental health and Amazon’s Alexa data practices. The Google deal may set a financial benchmark.

  3. Investor Impact:

    • Alphabet shares dipped 1.8% post-announcement. Analysts estimate global privacy reforms could cost Google $10 billion annually by 2025.

User Compensation and Next Steps

  • Filing Claims: Eligible Texans (estimated 7 million users) can submit claims via a dedicated portal by March 2024.

  • Tech Industry Reforms: Microsoft and Apple announced preemptive updates to their data consent frameworks, signaling industry-wide ripple effects.

Conclusion

The $1.4 billion settlement epitomizes the growing clout of state attorneys general in regulating Big Tech. While it delivers immediate financial relief and operational changes, advocates argue systemic reform requires federal action. As Texas AG Paxton vowed, “This is only the beginning.”